Indeterminism in Kane’s Event-Causal Libertarianism
Abstract
In this paper, I examine the plausibility of event-causal libertarianism, a prominent view on free will which regards indeterminism in the causal history of a decision as necessary for an agent’s moral responsibility for a subsequent action. Specifically, I investigate how Robert Kane’s event-causal libertarian account fares in light of Derk Pereboom’s powerful “disappearing agent” objection, in addition to criticisms of my own. Kane concludes that Pereboom’s objection is ineffective against his account. I argue against Kane’s conclusion by highlighting a dilemma which results from Kane's response to the disappearing agent objection; either way Kane’s position is interpreted, his account is unsuccessful.
Keywords:
- Keyword: Free Will
- Keyword: indeterminism
- Keyword: Kane
- Keyword: Pereboom
- Keyword: action
- Keyword: decision
- Keyword: event-causal libertarianism
- Keyword: determinism
- Keyword: disappearing agent
- Keyword: moral responsibility
- Keyword: plural voluntary control
How to Cite:
Nowell, R. J., (2014) “Indeterminism in Kane’s Event-Causal Libertarianism”, Pursuit - The Journal of Undergraduate Research at the University of Tennessee 5(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.7290/pur5dpih
Downloads
Download PDF